Separate names with a comma.
That was on another subject. And I'm saying it's a discrediting and disrespectful thing to say if you can't back it up. And by now, evidently,...
This is the least believable backtrack I have ever read. This wasn't a misunderstanding, you said she only got the job because of her gender and...
Ok, final post on the subject. I did quote you but deleted because I was being condescending. Here's why I find your view problematic: You know...
What in the world are you even trying to say? If you don't know why someone was given a job, don't pretend you know why she was given the job to...
Err? Again, here's my core argument that you're bizarrely jumping around: Which part of this has anything at all to do with me knowing for a fact...
Oh, right! I found it bizarre that me pointing out that you don't know something should somehow rely on me knowing the answer? I thought you were...
I argue that it's disrespectful to say that someone is there to tick boxes, as it's discrediting. You argue that I haven't watched the show. Ok...
Which one? If I did, it's probably because I found it irrelevant. But go ahead. Are you completely unable to think in abstract terms? I take...
You really try very hard to avoid my point here. What you're doing is discrediting to the person in question regardless of what you think about...
Just out of interest, how do you then suggest you should work on the structural racism that minorities do face in your job market? Minority...
Funny how you managed to slate all of those pundits without mentioning their gender and skin colour, despite the fact that they all tick the boxes...
I can't miss a point that isn't there. You claim she was given the job due to her looks, gender and skin colour and you have absolutely **** all...
Ok, must be skin colour and gender then, like you said. Certainly not the 140 caps for England. The football industry has a long, rich history of...
